Account Engagement, formerly Pardot, is built for B2B nurture and lead scoring against a sales pipeline. Marketing Cloud is built for high-volume, multi-channel consumer journeys. The deciding question is not company size — it is whether marketing hands leads to salespeople or markets directly to consumers.
The real difference is the data model. Account Engagement works with prospects tied to CRM records. Marketing Cloud works with data extensions that can hold anything, which is more powerful and more work. Choosing Marketing Cloud without the data architecture to feed it produces an expensive platform sending generic email.
This is why Ignyto starts with the data model rather than the tool. Where Data Cloud is needed to unify customer records first, we will say so — it is frequently the real first project.
Ignyto has delivered full migrations, rebuilding templates, journeys, forms and scoring models rather than lifting them across. A lift-and-shift carries the limitations of the old platform into the new one, along with a decade of unused assets.
Yes. Pardot was renamed Marketing Cloud Account Engagement. It remains a distinct product from Marketing Cloud Engagement, with a different data model and a B2B focus.
Some organisations do, typically where a B2B division and a consumer division have genuinely different needs. It doubles the governance and licence cost, so it should be a deliberate decision rather than an accident of procurement.
Account Engagement is generally lower cost to licence and to implement. Marketing Cloud costs more in both, and the gap widens if the data architecture needs building first.
Ignyto profiles and cleanses before anything moves, rebuilds templates and journeys natively, and maps scoring models to the new platform. Historic engagement data is migrated selectively rather than wholesale.
No pitch deck. We will tell you what the work involves, roughly what it costs, and whether the return is there.